首页> 外文OA文献 >Years of life lost (YLL) from cancer is an important measure of population burden – and should be considered when allocating research funds
【2h】

Years of life lost (YLL) from cancer is an important measure of population burden – and should be considered when allocating research funds

机译:因癌症而丧生的年数(YLL)是衡量人口负担的重要指标-在分配研究经费时应考虑

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Recently, cancer mortality has been compared to research spending by the National Cancer Research Institute (NCRI), whose research budget is approximately £250 million. The analysis shows a mis-match between mortality and research spending. As well as crude mortality rates, other measures of cancer burden should be considered because they contribute additional information. ‘Years of life lost' (YLL) summed over each individual dying after a diagnosis of cancer represents a population-based mortality indicator of the impact of that disease on society. Years of life lost divided by the number of deaths for each cancer site produces an additional statistic, the average years of life lost (AYLL), which is a measure of the burden of cancer to the individual patient. For 17 cancer sites where data are available, four tumour sites have a rather large difference in mortality, comparing YLL to crude mortality. Years of life lost shows the population burden from cancers of the ovary, cervix, and CNS to be rather larger than suggested by crude mortality, despite screening programmes for cervix cancer. Using YLL, the underprovision of funding for lung cancer research is similar to that reported using percentage mortality. Breast cancer and leukaemia receive a relatively higher research spend than the population burden of these cancers, and the spending on leukaemia is quite extreme. Prostate cancer has a low per cent YLL but attracts a moderate amount of research spending. The use of AYLL as an indicator of individual cancer burden considerably changes the ranking of the mortality from different tumours. The mean AYLL is 12.5 years. Prostate cancer has the lowest AYLL, only 6.1 years; brain tumour patients have the highest, at just over 20 years. Comparing AYLL to research spending suggests four ‘Cinderella' cancer sites with high individual cancer burden but low research spending: CNS tumours, cervix and kidney cancers, and melanoma. Breast cancer and leukaemia have roughly average AYLL but a considerable excess of research spending. YLL emphasises the discrepancy between research spending and mortality, and may be helpful for decisions concerning research support. Avearage years of life lost measures the burden to individual patients and may be helpful where individuals' needs are relevant, such as palliative care. As well as crude mortality, more subtle and comprehensive calculations of mortality statistics would be useful in debates on research funding and public health issues.
机译:最近,美国国家癌症研究所(NCRI)将癌症死亡率与研究费用进行了比较,其研究预算约为2.5亿英镑。分析显示死亡率和研究经费不匹配。除了死亡率,还应考虑其他癌症负担衡量指标,因为它们可以提供更多信息。癌症诊断后每个死亡者的总“生命年损失”(YLL)代表该疾病对社会影响的基于人口的死亡率指标。丧失生命的年数除以每个癌症部位的死亡人数得出的其他统计数据为:丧失的平均生命年数(AYLL),这是衡量单个患者癌症负担的量度。对于可获得数据的17个癌症部位,将YLL与原始死亡率进行比较,四个肿瘤部位的死亡率差异很大。失去生命的岁月表明,尽管有宫颈癌筛查计划,但卵巢癌,子宫颈癌和中枢神经系统的人口负担要比粗死亡率所暗示的要大得多。使用YLL,用于肺癌研究的资金不足准备与使用死亡率百分比报告的类似。与这些癌症的人口负担相比,乳腺癌和白血病的研究费用相对较高,因此在白血病方面的花费非常高。前列腺癌的YLL较低,但吸引了适度的研究费用。 AYLL作为个体癌症负担指标的使用大大改变了不同肿瘤死亡率的排名。平均AYLL为12.5年。前列腺癌的AYLL最低,只有6.1年;脑肿瘤患者的发病率最高,刚刚超过20年。将AYLL与研究支出进行比较,可以发现四个“灰姑娘”癌症站点具有较高的个人癌症负担,但研究支出较低:中枢神经系统肿瘤,子宫颈癌和肾癌以及黑色素瘤。乳腺癌和白血病的平均AYLL大致平均,但研究费用却大大超过了平均水平。 YLL强调研究支出与死亡率之间的差异,可能有助于做出有关研究支持的决定。失去生命的长年衡量了个体患者的负担,并且在涉及个体需求(例如姑息治疗)的情况下可能会有所帮助。除了粗略的死亡率外,更详尽,更详尽的死亡率统计数据在有关研究经费和公共卫生问题的辩论中将很有用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号